
Supreme Court Case Could Threaten Free Colorectal Cancer Screenings
The American College of Gastroenterology warns millions may lose access to life-saving colorectal cancer screenings.
The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) is urging the US Supreme Court to uphold the authority of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), warning that millions of Americans could lose access to essential
“Simply put, the implications of the Court’s upcoming decision on patient care and public health should not be understated,” said Amy S. Oxentenko, MD, FACG, president of the ACG,
The ACG represents the interests of gastrointestinal clinicians and their patients. In the brief, the group outlined the success and importance of CRC screening for public health, while also emphasizing the need to reduce barriers to access.
Since the USPSTF updated its recommendations that patients aged 45 to 49 years be screened for CRC, research found disparities based on socioeconomic status and area of residence, emphasizing a need for interventions in these areas to increase screening in all patients.2 Furthermore, CRC is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US.3 CRC has also been found to increasingly affecting younger adults, with diagnoses among those under age 55 years nearly doubling over the past decade.
The Supreme Court case comes at a critical moment in the fight against CRC. Although overall incidence rates have dropped nearly 50%—largely due to increased screening—early-onset CRC is on track to become the leading cause of cancer death in people aged 20 to 49 by 2030, according to the ACG.
The ACA’s preventive services mandate has eliminated cost-sharing for screenings, removing a key barrier to care. Research shows that out-of-pocket costs deter patients from getting screened, particularly those from lower-income backgrounds. If the Court upholds the lower court’s ruling in Braidwood, the ACG warns that screening rates could decline—leading to more late-stage diagnoses and higher mortality rates.
Although the ACG steered clear of constitutional arguments, it underscored the public health stakes. Beyond ACA-regulated insurance plans, the USPSTF’s recommendations influence screening mandates in 16 states. A Court ruling against the task force’s authority could trigger further legal battles over state mandates, leaving millions of Americans in limbo.
“Colorectal cancer screening includes colonoscopies and other, noninvasive tests that can detect warning signs before colorectal cancer develops,”
This spring, the court will decide the validity of the USPTSF and its recommendations under the Patient Protection and ACA.
References
1. ACG champions the importance of preventive care and colorectal cancer screening in Supreme Court amicus brief. American College of Gastroenterology. News release. March 5, 2025. Accessed March 7, 2025.
2. Bonavitacola J. CRC screening increases in patients aged 45 to 49 after USPSTF recommendation. AJMC®. October 7, 2024. Accessed March 7, 2025.
3. Steinzor P. 5 things to know about colorectal cancer. AJMC. March 7, 2025. Accessed March 7, 2025.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.