During a session on the first day of the 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology in Atlanta, Georgia, physicians shared current knowledge on cardiovascular toxicities of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as well as the potential for treatment-free remission with these agents.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have come a long way in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), so much so that survival in this patient population can be compared with the healthy population. However, recent findings on adverse events associated with these agents have raised concerns on the long-term impact of TKIs on a patient’s quality of life.
During a session on the first day of the 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in Atlanta, Georgia, physicians shared current knowledge on cardiovascular toxicities of TKIs as well as the potential for treatment-free remission with these agents.
Francois-Xavier Mahon, MD, PhD, of Bordeaux Segalen University, Bordeaux, France; Cancer Center of Bordeaux, Institut Bergonié, INSERM U1218, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, reviewed and summarized some of the recent studies related to TKI cessation in patients with deep molecular response, which have raised the idea of treatment-free remission (TFR).
During his talk, "Treatment-Free Remission in CML: Who, How, and Why?" Mahon said that the emerging goal of leukemia management is treatment cessation. “Studies have shown that this is feasible,” he added.
A recent study in Cancer Science, for example, evaluated the conditions important for dasatinib cessation in patients with CML who maintained a deep molecular response for at least 2 years.1 The study documented a 12-month treatment-free survival in about 63% of patients and tracked their molecular response as being a much smaller increase in natural killer cells.
A much earlier study by Mahon and some of his colleagues, published in 2001, showed that certain CML cell lines that had developed resistance to specific agents reacquired their sensitivity to the agent when left untreated for a specified period of time.2 A big collaborative study, authored by researchers from across various institutions in France, found that the loss of a major molecular response (MMR)—in this case with imatinib mesylate in patients with CML—was a safe criterion to restart therapy in patients who had a complete molecular response.3
“The question is why should we stop treatment?” Mahon asked.
He then listed a number of reasons that support stopping unnecessary treatment with TKIs:
“In addition to the patient’s quality of life, there’s increasing concern about the pharmacoeconomics of the lifelong use of TKIs,” Mahon added.
Several trials were designed to test this hypothesis:
Mahon had several recommendations for stopping TKI treatment in good responder patients who are outside of a clinical trial:
He added however, that instead of completely halting treatment, dose reduction is also an option in these patients.
Javid Moslehi, MD, of Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennesse, reviewed what is currently known about the cardiovascular toxicities of TKIs and discussed potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular adverse events.
“I am a cardio-oncologist by training,” Moslehi said, “and most of my clinic involves managing toxicities from cancer treatment.” He indicated that both older and newer anticancer therapies seem to have this cardiovascular effect, such that patients present with a wide range of myocardial toxicities.
“Interestingly, classic cardiovascular risk factors have been shown to be risk factors for cancer as well,” he noted.
Moslehi shared with the audience a detailed slide that listed some of the commonly used anticancer agents, many of which were TKIs, and their associated cardiovascular effects:
He then compared the TKI nilotinib with imatinib; in addition to vascular and cardiovascular events associated with nilotinib, it also causes hyperglycemia, which is also a known risk factor for cardiovascular events.
Moslehi pointed out that the lack of clarity, at least among oncologists, on the cardiovascular impact of TKIs. “We also need to get better at patient risk stratification: a personalized approach is needed for toxicity assessment,” he said, and provided the audience with some clinical perspectives:
“Education is vital,” Moslehi said. “We need to educate both patients and providers [about these cardiovascular risks].”