Currently Viewing:
Evidence-Based Oncology December 2019

Improving Survival in Lung Cancer: Commitment of The Lung Ambition Alliance

Giorgio Scagliotti, MD, PhD
For more than 45 years, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer has been working tirelessly toward a world without lung and other thoracic cancers. To add strength to our efforts we recently joined with other leading organizations in the lung cancer space to create a powerful force for change: The Lung Ambition Alliance
For too long, lung cancer has had one of the worst prognoses of any cancer. It is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide (Figure 1); only 1 in 5 people with lung cancer will be alive 5 years after diagnosis.1,2

New advances are creating the opportunity to transform the diagnosis, treatment, and management of lung cancer. However, survival rates have improved only modestly and are lagging behind those of other common cancers (Figure 2).3 The time for us to act is now: to come together as a community, to bend the lung cancer survival curve faster, and to significantly improve patient outcomes in this devastating disease. For more than 45 years, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), with our membership of nearly 6500 lung cancer experts worldwide,4 has been working tirelessly toward a world without lung and other thoracic cancers. The task is immense as lung cancer is, and to add strength to our efforts we recently joined with other leading organizations in the lung cancer space to create a powerful force for change: The Lung Ambition Alliance (“The Alliance”).

The Alliance unites the IASLC, the Global Lung Cancer Coalition, AstraZeneca, and Guardant Health with a common goal: to one day eliminate lung cancer as a cause of death. To achieve this bold goal, we will start by doubling the 5-year survival in lung cancer by 2025. Improving survival rates in lung cancer is both complicated and multifactorial; thus, our plans must be varied and dynamic to address each barrier to ensure optimal outcomes. We need to move beyond existing prevention efforts to target every point in the patient journey with innovative and effective strategies. This includes establishing early diagnosis through broader screening guidelines, developing more innovative medicines, and ensuring the best quality of care and support for patients and families. The Alliance has identified 3 priority areas that align with critical points in the patient journey, and we are already undertaking several flagship projects, focused on these priority areas, to create positive change in the lung cancer landscape.

Increasing Lung Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis

Late diagnosis is a key reason that survival rates for lung cancer are so poor.5 Forty percent of patients are diagnosed after cancer has already spread beyond the lung.6 To significantly shift the survival curve, we must diagnose and treat patients at earlier stages of disease. Because early-stage disease is often asymptomatic, this can be done only by improving lung cancer screening.

The IASLC has focused on improving lung cancer screening for some time. In October 2018, we issued a statement supporting the findings of the Dutch–Belgian NELSON (Nederlands-Leuven Longkanker Screenings Network) Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial7 and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).8

The landmark 2011 NLST was the first large-scale trial to show that lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can significantly reduce mortality. The NLST enrolled more than 50,000 patients, aged 55 to 74 years,9 who were current smokers with >30 pack-years of cigarette smoking history or who had quit smoking in the past 15 years.10 Results showed that participants who received LDCT scans had a 20% lower risk of dying from lung cancer than participants who received standard chest x-rays, and 50% of lung cancers detected by LDCT were stage I disease.11,12

However, in addition to highlighting the obvious advantages of screening, the NLST also revealed flaws in real-world national screening programs.13 First, CT scanning is associated with a high rate of false-positive results. In the NLST, 24.2% of the results from the CT scans performed were positive, and more than 96% of nodules uncovered were later deemed to be false positives,14 causing unnecessary stress and concern to thousands of patients.

In addition, for those patients who did test positive, further procedures were required to confirm the diagnosis, including additional scanning or a biopsy, which can be invasive and carry serious risks. Finally, perhaps the biggest barrier to large-scale screening programs is the limit that national insurance coverage and reimbursement policies place on which patients are eligible to receive screening.

For example, in the United States, guidelines were adopted by the US Preventive Services Task Force based on data from NLST, and lung cancer screening has been recommended since 2014. However, these guidelines have been enforced only in high-risk individuals (Table 1, SP384), which means that they are utilized by only about 8% of those dying from this disease annually.15

Outside the United States, few countries have screening policies. After reviewing the NLST results, many countries continued to wait for data from a study outside of the United States to confirm the findings before they considered implementing screening. Confirmation finally became available in 2018, when results from the 10-year follow-up of NELSON were presented at the IASLC 19th World Conference on Lung Cancer. With 15,822 participants, the NELSON trial was the largest-ever European lung cancer CT screening trial. The study was designed to determine the effect of stringent referral criteria and increasing screening intervals on the characteristics of screen-detected lung cancers. The study confirmed the findings of the NLST and helped to address key questions, including how to minimize false positives.

In NELSON, LDCT screening led to a 26% reduction (P = .0003) in lung cancer deaths in men and a 39% reduction (P = .0054) in women after 10 years, and it confirmed that we can increase the number of patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer. Compared with other trials, the screen-detected lung cancers of the NELSON trial were relatively more often diagnosed at stage I, when there is curative possibility, and less often at stage IIIB-IV, when the prognosis has significantly worsened. Findings from NELSON are summarized in Table 2.13,16

We now have the data and insights we need to act and implement national-level LDCT screening programs for people at high risk for lung cancer. However, despite growing evidence from lung cancer CT screening studies, few countries, districts, or regions have implemented LDCT screening for lung cancer. In countries where they do exist, policies vary from region to region, and too few sites are set up to implement screening effectively, too few patients are offered screenings, and there is low uptake.16-18

The Lung Ambition Alliance will focus its efforts and programs on addressing the potential barriers to the uptake of screening. We will promote greater understanding and awareness of the strong evidence of the benefits of implementing screening of high-risk populations with LDCT, as supported by findings from the NLST and NELSON studies.19 By doing so, we hope to encourage the adoption of national screening guidelines and policies. We will also continue to explore methods beyond CT scans to improve diagnosis rates of the diseases and to reduce false positives.

One of the foundational programs of The Alliance is advancing screening with the Early Lung Imaging Confederation (ELIC), a potentially practice-changing global resource for lung cancer researchers and care teams. ELIC is a new cloud-based screening registry that is designed to accelerate improvements in the multidisciplinary

detection and management of early-stage lung cancer.13,20 It uses new and emerging artificial intelligence and deep learning techniques to facilitate detailed analysis of gathered CT data to improve the reliability of clinical decision support with CT screening, and to assist in the development of precise quantitative disease biomarkers.21

ELIC was developed in 2018 by the IASLC with the intention of creating a large, globally accessible, privacy-secured network of shared CT lung cancer images and associated biomedical data.21 In December 2018, the IASLC announced the completion of a 4-month pilot project which showed ELIC’s potential to bring significant improvements to lung cancer screening by creating a viable environment for the analysis of large collections of quality-controlled CT lung cancer images.20 Phase 2 of the project is currently underway, in which additional “data spokes” are being added to make the registry of images more robust and powerful, and quantitative algorithm experiments are being run on data from 6 sites. Once this is complete, ELIC will expand out to a fully operational system and conduct numerous experiments of the internationally curated data.

Delivering Innovative Medicine

We are at a critical moment in the fight against lung cancer. Medical innovations and an increased understanding of the underlying biology of lung cancer are already shifting what is possible in treatment. The key challenge now is to accelerate treatment advances for people with lung cancer today, and for the millions who will be diagnosed in the future. However, several barriers remain to be overcome.

First, it is important that patients receive a timely and accurate diagnosis. Barriers to accurate and timely lung cancer staging represent a lost opportunity to guide patients on the appropriate treatment path. The IASLC has led in the creation of lung cancer staging standards for years. With the support of The Alliance, the IASLC is working to standardize international lung cancer staging guidelines and deepen insights into disease progression. Insights from this effort will inform the 9th edition of the Tumor, Node and Metastasis staging system, the most common method for staging lung cancer, and will guide physicians in identifying the right treatment

for the right patient at the right time.21

Secondly, testing for biomarkers plays an important role in guiding selection of patients for precision medicine therapies. However, currently, many patients who may be eligible for precision medicines, and the improved outcomes they may offer, are not being tested for biomarkers at diagnosis.22-27

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2020 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up