Currently Viewing:
Newsroom
Currently Reading
Report Finds Hospitals Costlier for Cancer Care Than Community Practices
September 29, 2017 – Christina Mattina
Early Imaging Can Identify Positive Immunotherapy Responders in Advanced Melanoma
September 28, 2017 – Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
Research Finds Cancer Survivorship Care Lacking in Advanced Primary Care Practices
September 27, 2017 – Christina Mattina
Report: Immune Checkpoint Proteins Are the Focus of Cancer Immunotherapy Development
September 27, 2017 – Alison Rodriguez
Title X Health Centers Reducing Cervical Cancer Screening in Accordance With Guidelines
September 26, 2017 – Christina Mattina
Lending the Patient Voice to Oncology Quality Measurement
September 26, 2017 – Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
JAMA Commentary Urges Realistic View of New CAR T-Cell Cancer Therapy
September 25, 2017 – Christina Mattina
New Advance Value Framework Offered as a Decision-Support Tool for Reimbursement
September 25, 2017 – Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
Immune Adverse Events From Nivolumab Predict Better Survival With NSCLC
September 23, 2017 – Christina Mattina

Report Finds Hospitals Costlier for Cancer Care Than Community Practices

Christina Mattina
Not only do patients with cancer incur higher costs when treated in the hospital outpatient setting compared with community oncology practices, they also have higher rates of emergency department visits, according to a recent study.
Not only do patients with cancer incur higher costs when treated in the hospital outpatient setting compared with community oncology practices, they also have higher rates of emergency department (ED) visits, according to a recent study.

The report, conducted by Xcenda and released by the Community Oncology Alliance (COA), evaluated the differences in costs and outcomes between hospitals and community-based practices for patients with breast, lung, and colorectal cancer. It used a claims database to identify 6675 patients with those cancers who received chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or surgery.

The community practice cohort consisted of 4450 patients, while the hospital clinic group contained 2225. They were matched based on characteristics like gender, age, geographic region, cancer type, and other clinical factors.

Patients who were treated in a community practice had significantly lower costs per month compared with those treated in a hospital practice ($12,548 vs $20,060; P <.0001). For an entire year, the cost of care in the hospital setting was 60% higher, or $90,144 more, than the same care delivered in the community setting.

This disparity was mainly driven by a large difference in medical costs, notably chemotherapy, which cost $4933 monthly in the community setting versus $8443 in the hospital practice (P <.0001). The price of chemotherapy was lower regardless of whether the region was branded, generic, or a combination. Additionally, the cost of physician visits was over 4 times higher in the hospital setting compared with the community ($3316 vs $765; P <.0001).

Besides incurring lower costs, community-treated patients also required fewer emergency visits than those treated in the hospital outpatient setting. Within 72 hours of receiving chemotherapy, 2.6% of the community patients and 3.6% of the hospital patients had an ED visit (P <.0055). Within 10 days of chemotherapy, 7.9% of the community patients had an emergency visit, compared with 9.8% of the hospital cohort (P <.0022).  

These findings are similar to those of other studies, including a literature review that observed that the average cost of cancer care was 38% higher in hospital-based practices compared with community clinics. Considering this cost differential, the current study raised concerns about the rates of community practices being absorbed into hospitals or health systems, which it stated may be related to the federal 340B drug pricing program, which provides discounted drugs to healthcare organizations.

“More than a decade of data have consistently shown that hospitals are a tremendous driver of excessive spending on cancer care,” said Ted Okon, executive director of COA, in a press release announcing the study’s publication. “Congress and the administration need to step forward and address this by reining in abuses of the 340B program and implementing site payment parity. It is crazy that our country continues to push more and more cancer care into the much more expensive hospital setting as we seek ways to reduce runaway health care spending.” 

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2019 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up