
Alternatives to PAIN Act Raises Access and Market Stability Concerns: Adam Colborn, JD
At AMCP 2026, Adam Colborn, JD, warns the Alternatives to PAIN Act may expand access but risk destabilizing Medicare Part D and limiting plan participation.
The Alternatives to PAIN Act would essentially reduce cost-sharing and prohibit specific utilization requirements under the Medicare prescription drug benefit for certain nonopioid pain management drugs.1 However, Colborn emphasized that mandates such as these create instability within the Medicare Part D marketplace, with the rising prices of these drugs.
“Plans [are] either reducing what they cover or withdrawing from markets entirely,” he said. “And there's a balance maybe that isn't being perfectly managed. What does ‘access’ mean beyond simply ordering that a drug is covered?”
He then explained that the Medicaid VBPs for Patient Act, the Access to Prescription Digital Therapeutics Act, and the Equitable Community Access to Pharmacist Services Act do a better job of balancing access with specific health coverages. These 3 bills collectively aim to expand access to high-cost therapies, create new statutory benefit categories, and reimburse pharmacists for their time, which overall can help
Additionally, Colborn noted that meetings such as AMCP bring together clinicians and pharmacists to address access gaps and ways to improve them.
“We're seeing a lot more collaboration between payers and pharmaceutical manufacturers and figuring out how to facilitate patient access in a way that works for everyone, and how do we do that in a value-based way that ties compensation to patient outcomes and can effectively monitor patient outcomes?” he said.
Reference
Alternatives to PAIN Act, HR 1227, 119th Cong (2025-2026). Accessed April 17, 2026.




