
Dialysis Is on the Ballot Again in California
For-profit dialysis centers are spending heavily to defeat the measure.
Two years after California voters soundly defeated a measure that would have capped profits for dialysis centers, the people get to weigh in on a different proposal—one that would require a doctor to be on site whenever the clinic is open.
The measure, known as
Supporters, including a service union, say it will lead to better care. Opponents include the American Nurses Association and the California Medical Association,
About 80,000 people in the state rely on dialysis treatments, which filter out waste from the blood for people with failing kidneys. Two companies, Davita and Fresenius, dominate the California dialysis market.
The ballot measure comes as the Trump administration pursues payment reforms that would make it easier for patients to have dialysis at home, by creating financial incentives that promote home dialysis technology. CMS was heading in this direction already, but the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic made
For-profit
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.