Opinion
Video
Panelists discuss how the CEPHEUS trial demonstrated that quadruplet therapy (daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) significantly improved minimal residual disease negativity rates compared to triplet therapy in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients, achieving approximately 60% vs 47% 10–5 responses while maintaining manageable safety profiles.
The CEPHEUS trial represents a landmark study in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma treatment, comparing quadruplet therapy (daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) versus triplet regimens. This clinical trial specifically addressed the challenging population of older, more frail patients who cannot undergo stem cell transplantation, examining whether adding a CD38 antibody could improve outcomes without compromising quality of life.
Key results from the CEPHEUS trial demonstrated a significant improvement in minimal residual disease negativity rates, with approximately 60% vs 47% achieving 10–5 responses when daratumumab was added to the base regimen. The subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab proved particularly beneficial for frail patients, reducing infusion-related adverse effects while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. The trial’s inclusion criteria reflected real-world community populations, including patients with high-risk cytogenetics and multiple comorbidities.
Clinical implications of the CEPHEUS trial suggest that quadruplet therapy can be safely administered to carefully selected transplant-ineligible patients, provided appropriate monitoring and multidisciplinary care support are available. The study reinforces the importance of achieving deep responses in multiple myeloma treatment while balancing functional status considerations. These findings are reshaping treatment paradigms for older myeloma patients, demonstrating that age alone should not preclude intensive therapy when patients can tolerate 4-drug combinations.
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.