
Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib and Venetoclax in CLL
Ryan Jacobs, MD, lymphoma division director at Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, explains the design and objectives of the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study comparing ibrutinib and venetoclax in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).
At the recent
In
Here in part 2, he explains the importance of CAPTIVATE’s design and the primary goals of the investigation.
Transcript
Can you discuss the design and the objectives of the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study?
CAPTIVATE was a study that began several years ago. It was a phase 2 study with an interest in exploring the efficacy and safety of putting the 2 most commonly used targeted treatments with small molecule inhibitors together, and that would be ibrutinib and venetoclax. At the time, ibrutinib was the only BTK [Bruton tyrosine kinase] inhibitor available. Of course, now there are additional BTK inhibitors. Venetoclax remains the only BCL2 inhibitor.
We have been using BTK inhibitors a lot in treating CLL patients. They are wonderful in how effective they are. There’s a presentation at this meeting of using a BTK inhibitor as a first-line treatment with ibrutinib,
So, this study [CAPTIVATE] was interested in harnessing the deep responses seen by venetoclax and still involving BTK inhibition and its positive, long-term effects on controlling CLL using the 2 agents together in an all-oral combination that’s given over a defined treatment timeline over the course of 1 year after a 3-month single-agent ibrutinib lead-in.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.