
ICYMI: Highlights From AMCP Nexus 2025
Key Takeaways
- The conference underscored the importance of policy and technological innovation for a sustainable US healthcare system, focusing on oncology advancements and targeted, value-driven cancer care.
- Real-world data is essential for overcoming barriers in CAR T-cell therapy, addressing high costs, limited coverage, and disparities in access.
AMCP Nexus 2025 explored innovative health care policies, oncology advancements, and the impact of new regulations on patient access and treatment outcomes.
These key takeaways and critical discussions presented at
The application of claims data also underscored the value of improved treatment adherence, as research showed that the HIV regimen bictegravis/emtricitabine/TAF (B/F/TAF) led to significantly higher 1-year treatment persistence. Finally, the regulatory environment surrounding pharmacy benefit managers represents a significant policy and market theme. While efforts aim to reduce conflicts of interest, experts noted that these varied state laws create administrative complexity.
Here is the top content from our coverage of AMCP Nexus 2025.
For payers and providers alike, knowing that these highly individualized cancer treatments face significant implementation hurdles is just half the battle. High costs, limited insurance coverage, and geographic and socioeconomic disparities may be known to put up roadblocks to the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, but the limited capacity of accredited centers to deliver the treatments, a lack of refined utilization criteria, and unclear decision processes also pose threats. To truly succeed at helping payers and health plans overcome these barriers, solutions must be sustainable and incorporate real-world data to improve decisions and outcomes, streamline care, and identify gaps in CAR T-cell therapy access.
Compared with dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC), DTG/abacavir/3TC, and multitablet regimens of DTG plus emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (DTG+F/TAF) or DTG plus F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DTG+F/TDF), lower rates of treatment switching were seen with bictegravir/emtricitabine/TAF (B/F/TAF) according to posters presented at the conference. A lower risk of making a switch was also seen with the triplet combination, with unadjusted analyses showing the lowest rates of switching among those with mental health or substance use disorders. Using medical and pharmacy claims data, investigators also showed that 1-year treatment persistence with B/F/TAF was significantly higher compared with DTG/abacavir/3TC, DTG+F/TAF, and DTG+F/TDF (80.3% vs 68.9% vs 62.4% vs 36.7%, respectively).
In the meeting’s final keynote session, “Oncology Pipeline 2025: Emerging Breakthroughs and Trends,” experts emphasized that the oncology pipeline is accelerating, driven by novel agents and new indications within existing drug classes, leading toward more targeted and value-driven cancer care. Recent FDA approvals also have focused on expanding existing drug classes like antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors and bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory
State legislation targeting pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) is rising rapidly across the US, with experts noting that although these laws aim to increase transparency and support local pharmacies, they may also increase costs and limit patient access. A significant example is Arkansas House Bill 1150, which prohibits the state Board of Pharmacy from issuing permits to any pharmacy owned by or affiliated with a PBM, a measure intended to protect independent pharmacies and reduce conflicts of interest. Although the bill passed, its implementation is currently delayed because of concerns that it conflicts with several federal laws and could limit patient access to essential services. Across the nation, most states have some form of PBM legislation, including reimbursement requirements, transparency laws, and oversight fees, all of which contribute to administrative complexity. The burdens these varied state laws create can ultimately stifle competition and result in higher administrative costs passed onto employers or clients.
Paul Ryan, former speaker of the House, addressed the necessity of implementing thoughtful policies and technological innovation to construct a more sustainable and effective US health care system amid the recent government shutdown. He argued that Congress must write clear, precise legislation to limit executive overreach, and he encouraged health care professionals to engage with policymakers to influence decisions. Ryan also highlighted the fiscal unsustainability of entitlement programs, advocating for reforms centered on patient choice and competition to modernize these systems. Stressing the global competition in technology, Ryan urged caution against overly restrictive artificial intelligence regulations so that the US can secure a first-mover advantage.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.













































