
News|Articles|July 30, 2026
Judge Denies Preliminary Injunction in Medicaid Work Requirements Case
Author(s)Sabrina McCrear
Fact checked by: Laura Joszt, MA
A federal judge heard arguments over whether CMS unlawfully narrowed the Medicaid work requirement exemption for medically frail beneficiaries.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Richard G. Stearns of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a motion for a preliminary injunction in Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al. v Oz et al., a lawsuit brought by 25 states and the District of Columbia challenging portions of CMS' interim final rule implementing Medicaid work requirements.1 As a result, the rule stays in effect while the underlying lawsuit continues.
Related to this article

HR 1 brings Medicaid work requirements and narrower immigrant eligibility by January 2027, and CBO projects 10 million more uninsured by 2034.

Medicare drug price negotiations lowered out-of-pocket costs for some beneficiaries, but those reaching the annual Part D cap saw no direct savings.

CMS ends ACA subsidies for 189,000 enrollees with duplicate Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP coverage or listed as deceased, with a 30-day dispute window.

Alice Hall-Partyka, JD, a partner at Crowell & Moring explains the lawsuits challenging CMS' Medicaid rule on pediatric gender care and its legal weak points.

Siva Mohan, MD, explains how drug costs drive silent nonadherence, PA burden, and biosimilar hesitancy, and what payers can do about it.

The editor in chief of Evidence-Based Oncology, who was recently named medical director of Precision Medicine for The US Oncology Network, discussed milestones met and those still to be achieved.
Advertisement
Advertisement


