
News|Articles|July 30, 2026
Judge Denies Preliminary Injunction in Medicaid Work Requirements Case
Author(s)Sabrina McCrear
Fact checked by: Laura Joszt, MA
A federal judge heard arguments over whether CMS unlawfully narrowed the Medicaid work requirement exemption for medically frail beneficiaries.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Richard G. Stearns of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied a motion for a preliminary injunction in Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al. v Oz et al., a lawsuit brought by 25 states and the District of Columbia challenging portions of CMS' interim final rule implementing Medicaid work requirements.1 As a result, the rule stays in effect while the underlying lawsuit continues.
Related to this article

A traditional Medicare out-of-pocket (OOP) cap could reduce beneficiaries’ costs but increase annual federal spending by $39 billion to $96 billion.

Average stand-alone Part D premiums are projected to rise by less than $1 a month as a temporary subsidy program ends after 2026.

Aligning financial incentives with patient-centered care is becoming an increasingly complex path to navigate within oncology.

CMS finalized the mandatory GLOBE Model, tying Part B drug rebates to international prices in areas covering 25% of beneficiaries from Jan. 1, 2027.

New data on atopic dermatitis show treatment gaps, heavy reliance on dermatology APPs, and wide state variation in specialist supply

FDA accepted United Therapeutics' sNDA for inhaled treprostinil in IPF. Here's what it could mean for patient access, coverage, and costs

A scoping review of 15 studies found psoriasis prevalence markedly lower across 13 indigenous populations worldwide.
Advertisement
Advertisement

