Opinion|Videos|June 12, 2024

Optimizing Benefit Design and Implementation for Improved PDT Access

Panelists explore how payers choose between pharmacy and medical benefit designs for covering prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs), optimizing patient access and adoption, and discussing why the selected pathway was considered optimal for a specific PDT.

Video content above is prompted by the following questions:

  • How do payers determine the optimal pharmacy vs. medical benefit design to cover prescription digital therapeutics (PDTs) to enhance patient access and adoption?
    • What factors and considerations went into the decision to cover a particular PDT through the pharmacy benefit versus the medical benefit, and why was that pathway determined to be optimal for that specific PDT?
  • What characteristics and factors did Mass Health consider when selecting clinics to prescribe and implement the use of prescription digital therapeutics?

Related to this article

Daniel Kyung Min, PharmD | Image: LinkedIn
The article explores the use of dose-intensive IV iron replacement to achieve long-term hemoglobin stability in patients with moderate to severe HHT-related bleeding. The approach recognizes what the author calls "the relentless and recurrent nature of HHT-associated bleeding," and may help patients achieve better quality of life.