-- Days : -- HRS : -- MIN : -- SEC
Register Now →
Opinion|Videos|March 6, 2024

Real-World Insights: Factor vs Emicizumab in Hemophilia A

Steven W. Pipe, MD, discusses real-world evidence comparing factor replacement to emicizumab in hemophilia A, exploring efficacy, adherence, and cost considerations.

This is a video synopsis/summary of an Insights featuring Steven W. Pipe, MD.

Pipe delves into the real-world evidence surrounding factor replacement therapy and emicizumab in treating hemophilia A. With a robust clinical trial program involving hundreds of patients, the discussion extends to over 2300 individuals in real-world settings, shedding light on adherence, efficacy, and outcomes. The data suggests that patients on emicizumab prophylaxis consistently maintain low annualized bleed rates, often ranging from zero to 2, with a significant proportion achieving zero treated bleeds annually. Pipe explores switching studies, acknowledging mixed results, especially in regions with varying prophylaxis approaches. While annualized bleed rates may not always show a clear differentiator, patient preferences, quality of life measures, and activity levels strongly favor emicizumab due to its regimen ease, subcutaneous delivery, and steady-state levels. The interview also touches on cost considerations, noting that in the US, emicizumab's pricing might result in higher annualized costs compared to standard half-life agents. The comprehensive analysis underscores the importance of real-world evidence in understanding the practical implications and patient-centric benefits of these evolving hemophilia A therapies.

Video synopsis is AI-generated and reviewed by AJMC® editorial staff.

Related to this article

Kenneth Komorny, PharmD, BCPS | Image: Moffitt Cancer Center
At a Stakeholder Interchange convened by The American Journal of Managed Care® in Tampa, Florida, an academic-community mix of hematologist-oncologists and pharmacists debated prior authorization, site-of-care payment disparities, and how aggressively to push bispecific antibody regimens to community practices treating patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, is the chair of the NCCN B-cell Lymphomas panel.  | Image: LinkedIn
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network update on mantle cell lymphoma puts covalent BTK inhibitors, MRD testing, and TP53 sequencing at the center of frontline care, while adding pirtobrutinib and a pair of CAR T-cell therapies for disease that progresses on a BTK inhibitor.