Opinion|Videos|April 25, 2025
Closing Perspectives
Experts discuss how to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to traditional monitoring, considering both clinical and quality outcomes, and what combination of economic and quality data would most effectively support broader CGM adoption across health systems and payer organizations.
Advertisement
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How do you evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CGM compared to traditional monitoring when considering both clinical and quality outcomes?
- What: combination of economic and quality data would most effectively support broader CGM adoption across health systems and payer organizations?
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Advertisement
Related Articles
- BCMA-Targeted Bispecific Antibodies: Navigating the New Frontier of Myeloma
September 17th 2025
- Linvoseltamab: A New Horizon for Relapsed Myeloma
September 17th 2025
- Rapid Therapeutic Effects Seen With a JAK Inhibitor
September 17th 2025
- SALT Scoring for Alopecia Areata
September 17th 2025
- The Potential Role of Screening for Atrial Fibrillation
September 16th 2025
- Remote Patient Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence
September 16th 2025
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
West Coast Health Alliance Releases First Vaccine Guidelines, Aiming to Replace CDC Recommendations
2
Hospitals in Underserved Communities Less Likely to Adopt Health Information Technology
3
Metabolic Issues More Common in Patients With HIV
4
Sotatercept Shows Right Heart Gains in PAH: Anjali Vaidya, MD
5