Opinion|Videos|March 21, 2025
CGM vs Traditional Monitoring
Experts discuss the clinical and practical factors that guide decision-making when recommending continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) vs traditional glucose monitoring for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following:
What clinical and practical factors guide your decision-making when recommending CGMs versus vs traditional glucose monitoring for patients with type 2 diabetes?
Advertisement
Related to this article
Kidney Week 2026 brought strong IgAN data, looked back on 5 years of value-based kidney care, and highlighted evidence of persistent CKD care gaps.
Elagolix 150 mg was noninferior to dienogest 2 mg for reducing moderate-to-severe endometriosis pain in a phase 3 trial of 230 women in India.
Norah Terrault, MD, MPH, on why few diagnosed patients reach HCV cure and how primary care test-and-treat can close the gap.
Initial frontal fibrosing alopecia treatment was largely similar in Black and White patients, though tetracycline use was higher in Black patients.
An analysis of AccessHope case reviews found that experts recommended changes in more than 80% of cases. About half were implemented, saving a median of $18,636 per case.
Nearly half of patients with chronic HBV or HCV also had MASLD, tied to worse fatigue and quality of life.
From taladegib to admilparant and inhaled treprostinil, here are the key 2026 advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis care.
Reductions in antibody function, not IgG titers, distinguishes efgartigimod responders in myasthenia gravis.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
HHS Draft Policy Eases Enforcement on 6 Compounded Peptides
2
BPC-157 'Wolverine Peptide' Use Rose 33-Fold Despite Scant Evidence
3
5 Things to Know About HHS's Interim Peptide Compounding Policy
4
Experts Pitch National Risk Pool to Fund Gene Therapy Access
5