CGM vs Traditional Monitoring

Author(s):

Davida Kruger, MSN, APN-BC, BC-ADM ,Jaime Murillo, MD, FACC, FASE

Experts discuss the clinical and practical factors that guide decision-making when recommending continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) vs traditional glucose monitoring for patients with type 2 diabetes.

EP: 1.CGM: Redefining Type 2 Diabetes Management

EP: 2.Key Benefits of CGM Technology

EP: 3.CGM's Impact on Clinical Inertia

Now Viewing

EP: 4.CGM vs Traditional Monitoring

EP: 5.Understanding CGM Metrics

EP: 6.Health Care System Integration

EP: 7.CGM Coverage and Access

EP: 8.Implementation Barriers

EP: 9.Overcoming Access Challenges

EP: 10.Adoption Strategies

EP: 11.The Metro Nashville Public Schools Initiative

EP: 12.Health Care Quality Impact

EP: 13.Population Outcomes and Return on Value With CGMs

EP: 14.Long-Term Outcomes Assessment

EP: 15.Closing Perspectives

Video content above is prompted by the following:

What clinical and practical factors guide your decision-making when recommending CGMs versus vs traditional glucose monitoring for patients with type 2 diabetes?

Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.

Subscribe Now!