Video Series

1 expert is featured in this series.

Intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulations each play important roles in modern oncology care, with distinct strengths and limitations. IV administration offers established dosing precision, flexibility for complex regimens, and familiarity across oncology practices, but it is often associated with longer chair time, higher staffing demands, and increased use of infusion resources. In contrast, SC injections provide a more streamlined approach, with shorter administration times and reduced need for infusion infrastructure. Emerging evidence suggests that SC formulations can meaningfully decrease health care utilization, improve clinic efficiency, and enhance patient convenience without compromising clinical outcomes. For patients, SC delivery may translate into less time in the clinic and a more favorable treatment experience, while practices may benefit from improved throughput and optimized resource allocation. Together, these considerations highlight the growing value of SC formulations in evolving oncology care models.

Zachary Contreras of Sharp Health Plan highlighted strategies discussed at AMCP Nexus for improving timely access to Monoclonal Migraine Receptor (MMR) therapy through updated coverage pathways, specialist input, and real-time benefit checks.

Zachary Contreras highlighted strategies discussed at AMCP Nexus for improving timely access to monoclonal migraine receptor (MMR) therapy through updated coverage pathways, specialist input, and real-time benefit checks.

Brand Logo

259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg H
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences®

All rights reserved.

Secondary Brand Logo