Video Series

An expert featured in this series.

Ushering in a New Combination-Driven Era in MCL

Published: | Updated:

Early ASH 2025 data suggest sonrotoclax is a promising therapy in MCL, supporting a broader shift toward chemo-free, combination-based strategies—particularly for patients with BTK inhibitor–refractory disease.

Managed care organizations should evolve cost models to capture savings from dextromethorphan-bupropion’s safety profile, which avoids costly complications associated with traditional Alzheimer disease agitation therapies.

1 expert is featured in this series.

Intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) formulations each play important roles in modern oncology care, with distinct strengths and limitations. IV administration offers established dosing precision, flexibility for complex regimens, and familiarity across oncology practices, but it is often associated with longer chair time, higher staffing demands, and increased use of infusion resources. In contrast, SC injections provide a more streamlined approach, with shorter administration times and reduced need for infusion infrastructure. Emerging evidence suggests that SC formulations can meaningfully decrease health care utilization, improve clinic efficiency, and enhance patient convenience without compromising clinical outcomes. For patients, SC delivery may translate into less time in the clinic and a more favorable treatment experience, while practices may benefit from improved throughput and optimized resource allocation. Together, these considerations highlight the growing value of SC formulations in evolving oncology care models.