-- Days : -- HRS : -- MIN : -- SEC
Register for Free →

Video Series

The panelists examined aripiprazole's pivotal trial design, which used an antidepressant lead-in phase followed by randomization to placebo or active drug among non-responders, with Thase detailing how dose-finding evolved toward lower 5 mg and 10 mg doses to minimize akathisia, the primary dose-limiting side effect, while preserving antidepressant benefit at doses lower than those used for antipsychotic indications.

5 experts are featured in this series

Led by the moderator, the panelists discussed how their practices use structured screening tools, electronic health record order sets, and attention to subtle behavioral symptoms to catch Alzheimer's disease earlier, and how targeted continuing medical education, a "see one, do one, teach one" mentoring approach, and e-consult safety nets are building primary care physicians' confidence to diagnose despite a shrinking pool of behavioral neurologists and geriatricians.

Led by the moderator, the expert mental health experts examined how tolerability shapes agent selection, with Wilkinson highlighting metabolic side effects and akathisia — most pronounced with aripiprazole — as key counseling points, alongside the value of anticipatory guidance in building patient trust and preventing premature discontinuation.

Led by the moderator, the panelists discussed persistent efficacy, tolerability, and adherence gaps in antidepressant treatment, noting that only about 60% of patients with MDD receive treatment and roughly 30% develop treatment resistance, with early adverse effects often undermining adherence before benefits take hold.

Almandoz challenged one of the most persistent misconceptions in metabolic disease management, that obesity treatment is primarily about weight loss, arguing instead that obesity is a systemic driver of healthcare utilization across multiple high-cost disease states including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, chronic kidney disease, and MASH, and that by the time a patient develops liver cirrhosis, heart failure, or end-stage kidney disease, the financial and human costs have already become enormous and largely preventable with earlier intervention.

Almandoz described his interpretation of the SYNCHRONIZE-1 findings, noting that while substantial and statistically significant weight reduction was observed, what captured his attention most was the nature and distribution of that weight loss, with the MRI sub-study demonstrating meaningful reductions in visceral and liver fat alongside relative preservation of lean mass, collectively pointing to a quality of weight loss that is biologically distinct from generalized weight loss.

Almandoz explained that while GLP-1 receptor agonism alone delivers meaningful benefits in appetite regulation, satiety, glycemic control, and cardiorenal and liver outcomes, the addition of glucagon receptor agonism introduces a distinct and complementary layer of biology that goes beyond weight loss alone to address the metabolic drivers most closely linked to insulin resistance, cardiometabolic risk, and MASH progression.

Jaime Almandoz characterized the historical management of metabolic disease as paradoxically siloed given how biologically integrated these conditions are, noting that a patient may have their obesity managed by one clinician, their diabetes by another, their cardiovascular disease by a third, and their liver disease, if addressed at all, evaluated in yet another separate setting, while the patient is experiencing all of these as one interconnected metabolic condition, creating fragmentation that delays diagnosis, duplicates effort, and leaves critical windows for intervention unaddressed.