Choosing between FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, and deciding when to shift to maintenance therapy, requires balancing prior treatment exposure, patient lifestyle, and the limited pool of active agents in colorectal cancer.
Comprehensive upfront biomarker testing, including RAS, BRAF, HER2, and MSI status, now anchors first-line treatment selection in metastatic colorectal cancer, though reflexive testing adoption still varies across practice settings nationwide.
Panelists discuss how support networks and coordinated care are essential for delivering third-line metastatic colorectal cancer therapies effectively in the community.
Panelists discuss how addressing barriers and sharing real-world data can increase community confidence in prescribing third-line metastatic colorectal therapies.
Panelists discuss how community and academic settings differ in applying third-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer and how collaboration benefits patients.
Panelists discuss how RWE informs treatment and safety decisions for special populations such as patients with ECOG PS 2 with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Panelists discuss how real-world outcomes inform patient conversations and support shared decision-making for third-line metastatic colorectal cancer therapies.
Panelists discuss how efficacy, safety, quality of life, and patient-specific factors drive selection among third-line therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Panelists discuss how the SUNLIGHT trial and real-world evidence support FTD/TPI with or without bevacizumab as an effective third-line option in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Panelists discuss how available third-line therapies, such as FTD/TPI, regorafenib, and others, are chosen based on survival data, safety, and patient quality of life.