
Opinion|Videos|March 4, 2025
Comparing Safety Profiles: Making Informed Treatment Decisions in mCRC
Experts discuss how they balance safety, efficacy, and overall patient prognosis when selecting third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and explore how the toxicity profiles of fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine + tipiracil ± bevacizumab differ, informing treatment decisions.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- When selecting third-line treatments for mCRC, how do you balance safety, efficacy, and overall patient prognosis?
- How do the toxicity profiles of fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine + tipiracil ± bevacizumab differ, and how can these differences inform treatment decisions?
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
Bronchiectasis Hospitalizations Deadlier, Costlier Than Those for COPD, Asthma
2
FDA Approves Sevabertinib for Nonsquamous NSCLC
3
Family Caregivers Report Weak Coordination With Medical Professionals
4
FDA Approves Selumetinib for Adults With Neurofibromatosis Type 1
5













































