
Opinion|Videos|March 4, 2025
Comparing Safety Profiles: Making Informed Treatment Decisions in mCRC
Experts discuss how they balance safety, efficacy, and overall patient prognosis when selecting third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and explore how the toxicity profiles of fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine + tipiracil ± bevacizumab differ, informing treatment decisions.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- When selecting third-line treatments for mCRC, how do you balance safety, efficacy, and overall patient prognosis?
- How do the toxicity profiles of fruquintinib, regorafenib, and trifluridine + tipiracil ± bevacizumab differ, and how can these differences inform treatment decisions?
Advertisement
Related to this article

HYPERION trial data shows a 76% reduction in clinical worsening events among adults recently diagnosed with PAH.

Diabetes care improves when support adapts to real-life changes, removing barriers and sustaining daily habits beyond reminders, education, and one-time interventions.

Imlunestrant plus abemaciclib doubled median PFS in patients with ESR1-mutated advanced breast cancer.

Global Burden of Disease data show prevalence fell nearly 30% from 1990 to 2021, yet the number of women affected grew 9.1%.

Logistic regression beats machine learning to predict autoimmune hepatitis recurrence after liver transplantation.

A new blood test for adults as young as 40 years arrives as employers and insurers still treat Alzheimer disease as an old-age condition.

Itch and skin appearance outranked safety for 300 US adults with chronic hand eczema, but cancer risk came next.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
FDA Approves First Treatment for Sanfilippo Syndrome Type A
2
No Blood Biomarker Is Ready to Pick Psoriasis Therapy
3
Real-World Data: FACT vs Non-FACT CAR T Outcomes Compared
4
Oral GLP-1s, Medicare Bridge Reshape Obesity Care: Holly Lofton, MD
5
