
Impact of Utilization Management Policies in Oncology
Panelists discuss how utilization management policies can delay oncology care and call for reforms that better align oversight with clinical evidence.
Panelists discuss how utilization management (UM) policies—such as prior authorization and formulary restrictions—affect daily oncology practice. They describe these policies as double-edged: While intended to ensure appropriate care, they often delay treatment, add administrative burden, and erode patient trust.
The conversation highlights the disproportionate impact on complex oncology regimens where timeliness is critical. Clinicians must often navigate multiple layers of documentation and appeals, diverting attention from direct patient care. Panelists advocate for data-driven UM reforms that differentiate between evidence-supported and outdated restrictions, calling for collaborative review systems that balance safety with clinical autonomy.
The group concludes that more agile, transparent UM frameworks—supported by automation and clinical input—could reduce inefficiency and improve patient outcomes.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.









































