A draft report on the value-based price benchmark for the newly approved PCSK9 inhibitors for lowering bad cholesterol found that Repatha and Praluent should cost approximately 85% less than their list prices.
A draft report on the value-based price benchmark for the newly approved PCSK9 inhibitors for lowering bad cholesterol found that Repatha and Praluent should cost approximately 85% less than their list prices.
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER)’s PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapies for High Cholesterol: Effectiveness, Value, and Value-Based Price Benchmarks provides prices that reflect the estimated improvements in long-term patient outcomes and a threshold for new drug costs that does not exceed growth in the overall national economy.
“Patients, clinicians, insurers — everyone needs good information in order to make the best decisions about the use and pricing of new drugs,” Steven D. Pearson, MD, MSc, the founder and president of ICER, said in a statement. “Our goal is to meet that need and in doing so not shy away from analyzing cost-effectiveness and potential budget impact.”
With between 3.5 and 15 million Americans potentially eligible to be considered for treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors, which have a list price of more than $14,000 a year, ICER sought to determine the true price at which these drugs would “represent a sensible value to patients and to the health care system.”
The report assessed comparative effectiveness research and value of both Praluent and Repatha in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, patients with established cardiovascular disease, and patients at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease. The review was based on 25 clinical trials and 2 published systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
After evaluating the comparative clinical effectiveness and comparative value of the PCSK9 inhibitors for patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the report determined that the 2 drugs have very similar effects and in the absence of a head-to-head trial, it is impossible to determine if one lowers cholesterol more than the other.
Overall, the ICER team reported that the PCSK9 inhibitors not only provide substantial or incremental net health benefit for all the patient populations studied, but the drugs appear to be very well tolerated thus far. However, it is important to note that the majority of studies lasted less than 6 months.
According to the report, treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors generates cost-effectiveness ratios that exceed the commonly-accepted $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). In order to meet that threshold, the drugs would need price reductions of 63% to 82% to reach between $3615 and $4811. These prices represent what best represents the overall benefits these drugs may bring to patients.
Overall, the draft value-based price benchmark for both Repatha and Praluent should actually be $2177, which represents a full 85% discount. This $2177 price tag represents the level at which doctors and insurers would not have to try to limit patient use in some way.
“Our draft report therefore suggests that $2177 is the price that should serve as an alarm bell—if the cost is more than $2177 a year, drug companies, doctors, insurers, and other parties may need to work together to determine ways to limit the use of these drugs, find savings in other parts of the health care system, or adopt other measures to help make these drugs more affordable,” Mr Pearson concluded.
Government agencies have created an online portal for the public to report potential anticompetitive practices in health care; there are changes coming to the “boxed warning” section for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR T) to highlight T-cell blood cancer risk; questions about the safety of obesity medications during pregnancy have arisen in women on them who previously struggled with fertility issues.
Read More
Gene, Light Therapy Combo Shows Promise Against Prostate Cancer Cells in Proof-of-Concept Study
April 18th 2024In their preclinical model, the researchers found efficacy both in vitro and in vivo by using CRISPR-Cas9 to mimic porphyria and combining the technology with light therapy.
Read More
Many Patients With Psoriasis in Clinical Trials Experience Nocebo Effects, Study Finds
April 18th 2024Half of patients exposed to placebo in clinical trials experienced adverse events (AEs), which may be partially explainable by nocebo effects, according to a recent review and meta-analysis.
Read More