Opinion

Video

Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy

Panelists discuss how patient-reported outcomes including symptom burden, treatment-related adverse effects, preserved functionality, and impact on quality of life should be prioritized alongside traditional clinical measures when assessing the value of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy therapies.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy Treatment Evaluation

Critical Patient-Reported Domains

Symptom Management

  • Fatigue assessment: Severity, impact on daily activities, and improvement with therapy
  • Energy levels: Changes in vitality and stamina for routine tasks
  • Edema-related discomfort: Swelling, tightness, and physical restrictions
  • Pain during hematuria episodes: Intensity and duration of flank or abdominal discomfort
  • Sleep quality: Disruption from nocturia, anxiety, or physical symptoms

Functional Capacity

  • Work productivity: Ability to maintain employment, attendance, and performance
  • Physical functioning: Capacity for exercise, household activities, and self-care
  • Cognitive function: Clarity of thinking and concentration with progressive disease
  • Social engagement: Participation in family events and community activities
  • Travel limitations: Impact of disease on mobility and travel independence

Psychological Well-Being

  • Disease uncertainty anxiety: Concerns about unpredictable progression
  • Treatment burden: Mental load of medication adherence and appointments
  • Depression screening: Mood impact of chronic disease diagnosis
  • Body image concerns: Related to edema, medication adverse effects, or future dialysis access
  • Sense of control: Patient empowerment in disease management

Treatment Experience

  • Medication adverse effects: Tolerability of prescribed therapies
  • Treatment satisfaction: Perceived benefit relative to burden
  • Health care interaction quality: Communication effectiveness with providers
  • Treatment convenience: Impact of therapy schedule on daily routines
  • Financial toxicity: Economic burden of treatment regimens

Implementation Considerations

  • Systematic assessment: Integration of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures into routine clinical workflows
  • Measurement frequency: Regular scheduled evaluation at meaningful intervals
  • Action thresholds: Defined parameters for intervention based on PRO results
  • Shared decision-making: Using PRO data to guide treatment choices
  • Comparative effectiveness: Inclusion of PROs in evaluating therapeutic options

Prioritizing these patient-centered outcomes alongside traditional clinical end points provides a more comprehensive assessment of treatment value and supports therapeutic decision-making that aligns with patients’ priorities and quality of life goals.

Newsletter

Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.

Related Videos
EHA 2025 Congress Recap | Image Credit: Venngage
Ashley Yocum, PhD
Dr Matthew Matasar
Dr Xavier Leleu
Dr Marina Kremskayana
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo