
Opinion|Videos|July 10, 2024
Primary Differences in the Toxicity Profiles of Abemaciclib and Ribociclib
A panel of experts compare the toxicity profiles of abemaciclib and ribociclib.
Advertisement
Video content above is prompted by the following questions:
- What are the primary differences in the toxicity profiles of abemaciclib and ribociclib when used in the adjuvant setting, and how are these prioritized when selecting a CDK4/6 inhibitor?
- Discuss the recent publication of long-term patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant abemaciclib.
Advertisement
Related to this article

Medicare's Transforming Episode Accountability Model is projected to save $46.6 million by 2030, with safety-net hospitals potentially receiving the highest reconciliation payments.

A comparison of 2013 and 2022 data shows that cancer costs are not uniformly rising. Costs decreased for metastatic colorectal cancer but increased for both metastatic non–small cell lung cancer and multiple myeloma.

Employer-mandated enrollment in a high-deductible health plan did not reduce use of oral targeted anticancer medications among patients commercially insured between 2007 and 2021.

We identify the health system characteristics associated with greater or lesser documentation of patients’ social determinants of health.

MA-to-MA switching among dually eligible beneficiaries rose sharply from 2016 to 2022, AJMC study author Grace Mackleby, PhD, found.

This moves the noncovalent BTK inhibitor into the first-line setting for certain adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.

CMS is adding value-based care (VBC) risk faster than many providers can build the data and tech capacity they need to succeed.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
Pipeline Advances in Sjögren Disease Bring Targeted Therapies Closer
2
FDA Approves Pirtobrutinib for Untreated CLL/SLL Without 17p Deletion
3
Preparing Practices for the Next Era of Hepatitis B Care
4
Pharmacists Bridge the Vaccine Trust Gap as COVID-19 Persists
5

