Opinion|Videos|February 24, 2025
Assessing Patient Confidence With Biosimilars
Panelists discuss how health care professionals have varying confidence in biosimilars, driven by concerns about efficacy, safety, and interchangeability. Increased education, real-world evidence, professional engagement, transparent regulations, and comprehensive outcome data can help build trust in these alternative biologic treatments.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How do you view patient confidence with biosimilars so far? What can be done to increase their confidence in biosimilars?
Advertisement
Related to this article
SaTScan detects an acute HCV outbreak cluster in California, showing the potential of automated surveillance, though real-time testing is needed.
Genetic analysis finds 125 loci shared by insomnia and CRP, with Mendelian randomization favoring an effect from insomnia liability to inflammation.
Proinflammatory diets were tied to higher mortality in MASLD and MetALD, whereas antioxidant-rich diets tracked with better survival.
An analysis finds distinct adverse event reporting patterns across immunosuppressive regimens, highlighting the need for tailored safety monitoring.
Sjögren disease involves far more than dry eyes and mouth, and variable symptoms plus multispecialty testing delay diagnosis, says Steven Carsons, MD.
Early MASH risk stratification, drug choice, and aligned coverage could improve outcomes, explained Zobair Younossi, MD.
These phase 3 EXCALIBER-RRMM findings build on earlier MRD-negative complete response results supporting FDA approval of the iberdomide-based regimen.
Admilparant 60 mg met the ALOFT-IPF primary end point, significantly improving FVC change vs placebo at 52 weeks in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Advertisement
Advertisement