Opinion|Videos|February 28, 2025
The Value Proposition: Justifying the Investment in HS Centers of Excellence
Author(s)Jennifer Hsiao, MD
Panelist discusses how organizations can justify the cost of Centers of Excellence for HS by improving patient outcomes, reducing complications, and enhancing care efficiency. Metrics for evaluating multidisciplinary care include patient satisfaction, quality of life, clinical improvements, and reduction in hospitalizations.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series
Video content above is prompted by the following:
- How can organizations justify the effort/cost of establishing Centers of Excellence for HS?
- What metrics should be used to evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care in improving outcomes for HS patients?
Advertisement
Related to this article
October's FDA approvals included the introduction of 5 non-oncology treatment options across specialties.
A phase 4 study found 69% of patients with OAB were consistently satisfied with vibegron at 12 months, with exploratory persistence of 59.8%.
Initial frontal fibrosing alopecia treatment was largely similar in Black and White patients, though tetracycline use was higher in Black patients.
From taladegib to admilparant and inhaled treprostinil, here are the key 2026 advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis care.
HHS does not intend to take enforcement action against pharmacies compounding BPC-157 and 5 other unapproved peptides if they meet 10 conditions.
Real-world data show antifibrotic dose reductions in IPF were not significantly linked to faster disease progression vs staying on full dose.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
Four Major Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Advances From 2026
2
As Employers Pull Back on GLP-1s, Andel and Novo Offer a Workaround
3
Birth Weight, Childhood Weight Gain Linked to Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Risk
4
Kidney Week 2026 Recap: IgAN Advances, Value-Based Care, CKD Care Gaps
5