
Opinion|Videos|June 4, 2025
Learnings From Key Clinical Trials in Ovarian Cancer
Author(s)Kathleen Moore, MD, MS
Experts explore the evolving landscape of ovarian cancer treatment, emphasizing the need for targeted therapies and biomarker-driven approaches.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content is prompted by the following:
Lessons From Recent Clinical Trials
Key Discussion Points:
- Biomarker-Driven Treatment Selection
- Current challenge of selecting from multiple approved therapies with overlapping biomarkers
- Need for predictive power of biomarkers beyond simple positivity (eg, understanding implications of HER2 2+ vs folate medium expression)
- Sequencing implications of therapies with overlapping toxicity profiles
- Treatment Sequencing Considerations
- Critical importance of first therapy selection in platinum-resistant setting given patient drop-off with subsequent lines
- Limited understanding of how different biomarkers interact (BRCA, HRD, CCNE1, HER2, folate receptor)
- Patient-specific factors influencing treatment selection beyond biomarker status
- Evolution of Clinical Trial Design
- Moving away from “spray and pray” approaches with all-comers to biomarker-driven selection
- Learning from past experiences with immunotherapy trials that enrolled thousands without clear biomarker strategy
- Need for smarter trial designs that enable more precise patient selection
Notable Insights:
- “Which one do I start with? Do I start with trastuzumab deruxtecan or do I start with mirvetuximab and bevacizumab?... Right now, we’re guessing.”
- “We’ve said forever, ‘We don’t have mutations, and we don’t have anything to target.’ We have a lot of things to target. We just are at the early days of figuring out what it means.”
- “3,000-plus patients exposed to 4 different sponsors’ frontline studies of immunotherapy and PARP...can’t do that again...I think we’ve learned that lesson, and we’re going to do better moving forward.”
Advertisement
Related to this article

Antimicrobial resistance in bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis varied widely in a study spanning 11 centers on 3 continents.

Experts break down the GOLD 2026 COPD guidelines, highlighting updates to diagnosis criteria, Group E risk categories, and nonpharmacologic interventions.

An economic evaluation found nontargeted hepatitis C screening in emergency departments offered the greatest health benefit at a cost-effective price.

Naim Alkhouri, MD, on when to judge MASH treatment response, counseling on weight and muscle loss, primary care screening, and future trial end points.

Pharmacists outline new oncologic therapeutics, from pancreatic cancer to myeloma, and what high prices and crowded markets mean for payers.

Invivyd presented preclinical IDWeek 2026 data on VMS063, an investigational antibody that neutralized B3 and D8 measles variants in vitro.

Sphingolipid profiles in plasma and breath condensate differed between IPF and f-HP and tracked with disease severity, CHEST 2026 data show.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
NYC Marathon Death Puts Rhabdomyolysis Risk Factors in Focus
2
Acoramidis Linked to Fewer Hospitalizations Than Tafamidis in ATTR-CM
3
Real-World Evidence, Rare Liver Disease Data Headline Kidney Week 2026
4
EEOC Reportedly Plans to Narrow Pregnancy Accommodation Rules
5



