
Opinion|Videos|May 5, 2025
Lorlatinib in Focus: Survival, Brain Metastases, and Beyond
Panelists discuss how the 5-year CROWN trial data for lorlatinib have shaped the treatment paradigm for ALK+ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly regarding long-term survival, durability of response, and management of brain metastases.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Panel Introduction
CROWN Trial and Lorlatinib Treatment in ALK+ Metastatic NSCLC
- Discussion focused on the 5-year data from the CROWN trial evaluating lorlatinib for ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC
- Analysis of how these long-term outcomes have influenced the current treatment paradigm
- Comparison of clinical trial results with real-world outcomes observed by treating physicians
Key Treatment Considerations
- Long-term survival benefits and durability of response with lorlatinib
- Emphasis on efficacy against brain metastases, which are common in ALK+ NSCLC
- Cost-effectiveness evaluations when selecting frontline treatment options
Clinical Implementation
- Real-world efficacy and safety profile of lorlatinib compared to clinical trial results
- Practical considerations in implementing treatments based on CROWN trial evidence
- Balance between efficacy outcomes and economic considerations in treatment decisions
Notable Insights
- Dr. Dietrich was asked to describe the CROWN trial design and elaborate on how the 5-year data has influenced the treatment landscape for ALK+ metastatic NSCLC, particularly regarding survival outcomes and response durability.
- Dr. Lovly addressed the unique long-term outcomes with lorlatinib, especially its efficacy against brain metastases, and discussed the complex balance between cost considerations and clinical efficacy when making frontline treatment decisions.
- Castronovo provided perspective on real-world clinical experience with lorlatinib, comparing observed efficacy and safety profiles with those reported in the controlled CROWN trial setting.
Advertisement
Related to this article

October's FDA approvals included the introduction of 5 non-oncology treatment options across specialties.

A phase 4 study found 69% of patients with OAB were consistently satisfied with vibegron at 12 months, with exploratory persistence of 59.8%.

Initial frontal fibrosing alopecia treatment was largely similar in Black and White patients, though tetracycline use was higher in Black patients.

From taladegib to admilparant and inhaled treprostinil, here are the key 2026 advances in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis care.

HHS does not intend to take enforcement action against pharmacies compounding BPC-157 and 5 other unapproved peptides if they meet 10 conditions.

Real-world data show antifibrotic dose reductions in IPF were not significantly linked to faster disease progression vs staying on full dose.

Naim Alkhouri, MD, on real-world resmetirom results, when biopsy is still needed, choosing a GLP-1 or resmetirom, and access barriers in MASH
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
Four Major Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Advances From 2026
2
Machine Learning Has High Accuracy, Little Prospective Validation in MPNs
3
BPC-157 'Wolverine Peptide' Use Rose 33-Fold Despite Scant Evidence
4
The Next Decade of Cancer Care Is Coming Home: Who Will Be in the Driver’s Seat?
5

